Est. MMXVIII · London26 May 2026
III.实践银行
Question Bank

一万个问题，为规范而写。

每个问题都映射到 SQE1 规范节点并附有详细解释。按主题和难度进行过滤，随着时间的推移跟踪弱点，并重新审视你做错的问题，直到主题变得更加困难。开始免费，然后升级到 FLK1、FLK2 或完整的 SQE1 访问权限。

i.免费试用

请向我们提出十个问题 — 没有登录，没有卡。

The trial uses the same engine as the full bank — same question style, same explanations, same difficulty filters. Pass through the ten and you'll know whether the format suits how you study.

开启免费试用
问题 · Land Law
i.
Trusts of Land · TOLATA 1996

Mr and Mrs Jones bought a house as joint tenants. They later separated but did not sever the joint tenancy. Mrs Jones moved out; Mr Jones paid the mortgage and bills. After five years she claims a beneficial interest under a trust of land. Which best states her position?

A.No beneficial interest beyond survivorship.
B.Can claim under TOLATA if she shows an express or implied common intention to share.
C.Automatic 50% beneficial interest from being a registered joint tenant.
D.Only with direct mortgage / purchase contributions.
E.Extinguished by leaving and not contributing.
为什么这很重要

TOLATA 1996 + Stack v Dowden / Jones v Kernott: a constructive or resulting trust depends on common intention, not on which name appears on the title.

问题 · Trusts
ii.
The Three Certainties

“I hereby declare a trust of my shareholdings in ABC Ltd on trust for my grandchildren when they reach 18.” The settlor has three grandchildren now and anticipates more; the deed does not specify which grandchildren or shares. Validity?

A.Valid — intention is clear and beneficiaries ascertainable.
B.Valid — subject matter and objects are sufficiently certain.
C.Invalid — certainty of objects fails; unclear which grandchildren benefit and how.
D.Invalid — certainty of intention is not satisfied.
E.Invalid — subject matter is uncertain because the shares were not segregated.
为什么这很重要

Knight v Knight + McPhail v Doulton: a private trust fails for uncertainty of objects where the class is not identifiable with sufficient precision at the date of declaration.

问题 · Criminal Practice
iii.
Bail Applications · Bail Act 1976

David is charged with aggravated burglary. At his first Magistrates’ hearing he applies for bail. The prosecution opposes: a previous similar conviction, alleged flight risk, possible witness interference. Which best describes the court's approach?

A.Must grant bail unless the prosecution proves risk on the balance of probabilities.
B.Discretion to refuse bail if necessary to prevent absconding, further offences, or interference.
C.Must refuse bail because aggravated burglary is indictable.
D.Must grant bail unless there is clear and convincing evidence the defendant will abscond.
E.Can refuse only with the defendant's consent.
为什么这很重要

Bail Act 1976 sch 1: there is a presumption in favour of bail, but the court may refuse for the listed substantial grounds — past record is a relevant consideration, not a bar to bail.

选择您的计划

选择最适合您的学习需求的访问级别

£575
每 1 个月访问权限

完全访问所有 SQE1 科目、题库和所有课程材料

包含在 完全 SQE1 访问权限:

所有 13 个 SQE1 科目
完整题库访问权限
访问所有 SQE1 课程学习材料
完整的分析

需要帮助选择吗？

高级题库

Our Question Bank is meticulously designed to provide comprehensive support for candidates preparing for SQE1. By unlocking it, you'll gain access to an extensive array of revision resources, intelligent learning tools, and corresponding course materials, empowering you to prepare efficiently and achieve outstanding results in your examination.

适应性学习

人工智能根据您的表现调整问题

绩效分析

详细的跟踪和进度报告

人工智能支持

每日 50 场问答环节，以 53 种语言进行

间隔重复

保持记忆的科学方法

弱点检测

自动识别薄弱区域

定期更新

每月更新反映最新趋势

完整的功能列表

广泛的题库涵盖所有 SQE1 考试科目
订阅期间可获取相应课程学习资料
每月题库更新反映最新考试趋势
自适应学习技术动态调整问题
针对主题、数量和类型的可定制练习课程
自动识别弱点并提供有针对性的改进建议
详细的绩效分析和进度跟踪报告
真实的模拟考试环境
基于科学的间隔重复功能
每日 50 条由人工智能驱动的即时澄清
无限的基于电子邮件的学术支持
每周 MCQ 解释及补充材料
通过定期统计报告进行同行比较

💡 注册课程可省钱

所有 SQE 课程注册均免费包含题库。 考虑我们的综合课程以获得最佳价值！